Why Zooped Sucks
September 13, 2007
If you're new here, and interested in the latest news and insights on social media marketing, you may want to subscribe to our RSS feed. Thanks for visiting Ignite Social Media.
About a month ago, we got a comment on this site asking us if we’d reviewed Zooped.com yet. I’m pretty confident that the post came from someone who works at Zooped trying to get coverage, but as a soical media agency, we decided it was our duty to try it out anyway. As you can tell from the title of this post, it’s not a positive review.
What the folks at Zooped are trying to do is converge a lot of interesting social networking ideas into one place. While that’s an attractive idea on the surface it’s one that, I believe, is doomed to fail. (Read “The Origin of Brands” on Google Books by Al & Laura Reis to learn why.)
On Zooped, you can put up your profile, upload and listen to music, post info about your business, post videos, play games or add them to your blog, or read the news. Of course, that’s the problem. Zooped isn’t the best place to do any of these things, so putting them all in one place doesn’t make it any better.
Like a number of other social networking sites trying to make a go of it, Zooped faces a classic chicken/egg proposition. Social network’s value is in size. When I first signed up, Zooped had only about 7,000 users. As of today, a month later, they have 12,351. Good growth from a percentage standpoint, but infinitesimally small compared to the big networks. Until they get users, they can’t really be interesting. Until they’re really interesting, they can’t get users. Tough place to be.
The Zooped folks may have had a chance if they opened their walled fortress under the social graph, or social network portability, concept. But again, I’m supposed to re-enter all my friends, convince them to join this space, etc. etc. Yet I see no compelling reason to offer them for their trouble. Oh, and want to have your blog on your profile? Start a new one on Zooped. They won’t let you import your existing blog via RSS. How dumb is that?
Most annoying, Zooped absence of real networking has opened it up to the spammers. Of the six emails from “friends” I’ve gotten, four have been Nigeria Scams, and two have offered to date me (no doubt as step one before they begin the Nigeria scam of their own). Each time, Zooped sends me an annoying email that says I have note from my friend, but no hit as to the content of that note or who it is from, and no link to it. While I understand the lack of a link is probably a security measure, it makes signing in a major pain.
I’m not being critical of the programming folks at Zooped. They may, or may not, have built a great platform. But their business decisions, mixed with the natural difficulty of starting a social networking site, make Zooped a non-starter.
Comments
11 Responses to “Why Zooped Sucks”
Got something to say?
thank god for zooped your blog sucks and no one reads it
lucky for zooped your blog sucks and no one will see this
[…] I said last week in my post "Why Zooped Sucks", any MySpace replacement needs a way to push a lot of people into a site very fast or it […]
omg..7000 to 12k in one month? Thats amazing! We all know thats amazing and well..there really is no need to be jealous. I mean this site ignite social something ..whoa first off the name is way too long.. second the colors mustard and ketcup? haha..a complete joke!
I love these Zooped comments. Illiteracy and passion are a dangerous mix. But I am really confused about the passion for this particular place. Someone, cogently, fill me in?
For the record. Zooped is now at 12,866 members, up a whopping 500 people in the last month instead of 5,000 the month before.
Perhaps my post was the high water mark for Zooped?
“Until they get users, they can’t really be interesting. Until they’re really interesting, they can’t get users.”
I disagree with that statement. I think there are many interesting small-knit communities, and that is why they grow. Craig’s List and Wikipedia were interesting from the beginning; that’s why they became big. It’s the innate viralness of small networks that bring them to critical mass if they have no huge advertising budget (like craig’s list and wikipedia.)
Anyway, Zooped is like a dirty mushroom sitting on the ground.
Jack,
Thank you for the first thoughtful Zooped comment. I agree with you that niche communities can be the most interesting. No doubt. My issue with Zooped is that it doesn’t seem to be built around any niche. It seems like it’s trying to be Facebook-like or MySpace-like (or even “better).
But it’s not. So instead of trying to converge (be everything to everyone) like Zooped is doing, they should diverge and be really good for some group.
Thanks for your thoughts.
~Jim
This fella is right, zooped does suck! i cant see it overtaking something like facebook thats for sure!
I like zooped a lot
@Thanks Terry. I haven’t looked at Zooped in a while. I see their home page has celebrity gossip on it now. It does give the site a bit more personality. I killed my membership so can’t see if it’s grown (and won’t sign up again).
But having said that, why do you like it Terry? Just curious…
I love zooped